Boat or float

Sun, clouds and boating at Matanzas Inlet, St. Augustine, Florida

It’s safe boating week and time to think more clearly about our activities in and around the water. Whether you boat or float it’s good to recognize safe procedures. If you are not safe in the boat then it’s likely you’ll float in the water; and hopefully not be subdued by the elements. If you float and are not careful then you may encounter a boat. https://safeboatingcampaign.com

In 2017, the U.S. Coast Guard reported 658 deaths in the U.S. from boating incidents, with 75 percent of those deaths caused by drowning. Of those deaths, 85 percent are reported as not wearing their life jackets.

In the U.S. there is currently a national boat safety emphasis going on now. National Safe Boating Week kicked off with “Wear Your Life Jacket to Work Day,” May 17. Although I don’t work in a workplace any longer I don’t recall seeing anyone wearing a flotation device around. Did you? #safeboating

The safe boating campaign goes on throughout the boating season, whenever that is in your own area around the world.

I’m curious! How are these safety procedures presented and followed in other places of the world?

The Safe Boating Campaign reminds boaters to follow these safety tips:

  • Take a boating safety course.
  • Wear a U.S. Coast Guard approved life jacket.
  • Watch the weather.
  • No distracted boating.
  • Travel at safe speeds.
  • Never boat under the influence.
  • Have more than one communication device that works when wet.

Safe travels, boating and floating!

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

Missionaries and Military

As the new world project that would eventually become the United States of America continued to develop roots, much of the development of La Florida is attributed to the Spanish military and the missionaries.  Let’s take a look at the St. Francis Barracks in St. Augustine, Florida as an example.

In 1588, Franciscan missionaries settled in northeast Florida around St. Augustine.  For 175 years, the Convento de San Francisco served as headquarters for those who labored on behalf of the Spanish king to bring the Catholic faith to Native Americans who inhabited “la Florida.” 

Following Governor Moore’s siege of St. Augustine in 1702, the destroyed buildings of the mission were reconstructed using coquina taken from the king’s quarry on Anastasia Island. 

Coquina wall at St. Francis Barracks, St. Augustine
Artifacts found at the Franciscan friary location. Some of the original coquina walls still remain today as part of the museum in the St. Francis Barracks.

In 1763, the British took possession of Florida and designated St. Augustine as capital of the colony of East Florida.  A decision was made by military authorities to occupy the former Franciscan mission and convert the chapel originally constructed in the 1730s and 1740s into a barracks.  These barracks were supportive of operations at the Castillo de San Marcos (old fort) almost a mile to the north.    

The friary where the missionaries lived was also renovated, with fireplaces added to the enlarged living quarters. When the Spanish returned to St. Augustine in 1783, the Franciscans initially occupied the site but were soon replaced by soldiers of the Spanish garrison. 

In 1821, Florida was ceded to the United States and the U.S. Army took possession of the military post.  It remained a federal facility until 1907 when the Florida National Guard, and Florida Department of Military Affairs, moved its headquarters from Tallahassee to St. Francis Barracks.  (See https://dma.myflorida.com/st-francis-barracks-frontier-monastery-to-state-arsenal/)

Troops stand guard at the St. Francis Barracks military post, circa 1890.

Who could imagine that the United States military would eventually form with the efforts of the Spanish and British to protect the homeland it was discovering. 

Modern-day St. Francis Barracks

There remains ongoing debate between Florida and Massachusetts concerning when the “First Muster” of troops to protect the homeland began – which was before the federal, U.S. military was formed. 

Painting depicting the First Muster near St. Augustine in 1565. https://www.floridashistoriccoast.com/events/first-muster

Florida claims the first assembly of a military unit began in 1565 when Pedro Menendez formed a band of Spanish troops, along with area Native Americans, to fight against the French who had assembled around Jacksonville.  (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_assault_on_French_Florida; http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WMQC6D_First_Spanish_Muster_Site_in_Florida)

Massachusetts claims the first official muster of troops began on December 13, 1636 as the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony ordered that the colony’s militia be organized into three regiments: the North, South and East Regiments.  The regiments were needed for a growing threat from the Pequot Indians.  The military prepared with weekly drills and guard details.  In 1637, the East Regiment officially mustered for the first time on the Salem Common to mobilize in its defense.  This day is identified as the birth of the modern-day National Guard.  https://www.salem.com/veterans-services/pages/first-muster

I guess it depends on your each person’s perspective concerning who had the “First Muster.”  Regardless, our freedoms are won or lost by those who train, prepare, equip and respond to the needs of the citizenry, whether it is from local citizens, local law enforcement, state military and law enforcement or federal military and law enforcement.

I also reflect on the sacrifices of our Native Americans.  They lost so much as the new world was developed over the years.  The struggles for them to maintain their own freedom were met with much despair and loss as myriads began flowing into the territories.  We owe much to our Native Americans.  

Flags of the United States and Florida wave in sync at the St. Francis Barracks in St. Augustine.

May is military appreciation month and we in the United States are appreciative of those who rise to the occasion to obtain, keep and maintain that which we hold so dear.  

We who serve, and served, consider it a great honor to protect those who long to be free with certain unalienable rights – among them being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  May we never fail nor falter.  We salute those who continue holding up the torch of freedom with their very lives on the line!

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

#MilitaryAppreciationMonth

#MilitaryAppreciation

Castillo – Fort or Castle

Castillo! Is it a castle or a fort? Both. As a follow-up post about Castillo de San Marcos in downtown St. Augustine, Florida, I want to reiterate that it is the oldest masonry fort in the United States with unique North American architecture. It remains as the only surviving 17th century military construction in the country.

Does it look like a castle? Well … maybe. I think it looks more like a fort though. Opening in 1695, Castillo became a showpiece for military defense engineering.

A monument not only of stone and mortar but of human determination and endurance, the Castillo de San Marcos symbolizes the clash between cultures which ultimately resulted in the unique, unified United States. Still resonant with the struggles of an earlier time, these original walls provide tangible evidence of America’s grim but remarkable history.
https://www.nps.gov/casa/learn/historyculture/construction.htm

Thank you Italy for providing the star shape design from the 15th century. I’m amazed how the architecture fit the technology of the day. Of the major architectural variations, the “bastion system,” named for the projecting diamond or angle shaped formations added onto the fort walls, was the most commonly and effectively used to combat the new weapons – cannons.

The Spanish occupying Florida knew about the coquina rock formations along the coastline, but they were soldiers, not stonemasons or builders. Wood structures would not last against the increasing firepower and technology of invading forces.

The British, settling to the north, edged into the Carolinas. Spanish Florida was only a short sail away. How could the Spanish keep the British from taking over Florida? Apparently, the goal of the British was to set up a base of operations to attack the Spanish treasure fleets and the more wealthy colonies of the Spanish Caribbean.

To help counter this threat, the Spanish began construction on the Castillo de San Marcos in 1672 – using coquina.

Coquina – courtesy of National Park Service

Coquina Rock to the Rescue

Coquina stone was quarried in the area of present-day Anastasia State Park on Anastasia Island (part of St. Augustine). Military engineers and stonemasons were brought from Spain. Convicts and additional soldiers were brought from Cuba. Oyster shells were burned into lime and mixed with sand and water to make mortar.

Coquina rock at Washington Oaks, Florida, between Crescent Beach and Marineland

Coquina rock is a type of sedimentary rock such as limestone. It was formed by the deposits and cementing together of mineral and organic particles on the ocean floor or other bodies of water on the surface.

The coquina rock used at Castillo de San Marcos was likely retrieved from the formation that stretches from St. Augustine to Palm Beach County, Florida.

According to geologists, thousands of years ago, the tiny coquina clam donax variabilis lived in the shallow waters of coastal Florida, as they still do today. These are the small pink, lavender, yellow, or white shells one sees along the beach at the waterline.

As the resident clam died, the shells accumulated in layers, year after year, century after century, for thousands of years, forming submerged deposits several feet thick. During the last ice age, sea levels dropped, exposing these shell layers to air and rain. Eventually, the shell became covered with soil, then trees and other vegetation. Rain water percolating through the dead vegetation and soil picked up carbon dioxide and became carbonic acid, the same ingredient that makes soda fizz. (National Park Service)

By the way, one of the best coquina rock formations is at Washington Oaks, between Crescent Beach and Marineland, Florida, on the Atlantic Ocean. It’s worth a trip to enjoy the beach and see the rock formations. https://www.floridastateparks.org/learn/geology-coquina-rocks

As the weak acid soaked downward, it dissolved some of the calcium in the shells, producing calcium carbonate, which solidified in lower layers, much like how flowstone and stalactites are formed in caves. This material “glued” the shell fragments together into a porous type of limestone we now call coquina, which is Spanish for “tiny shell”.

Given its light and porous nature, coquina would seem to be a poor choice of building material for a fort. However the Spanish had few options. Coquina was the only stone available on the northeast coast of La Florida. The porous coquina actually became an unexpected benefit – with its mixture that contained millions of microscopic air pockets that allowed it to compress.

Coquina “rabbit”?

The walls being constructed for the Castillo would be untested but the coquina was the only way to give the Spanish a fighting chance against the British. The inner courtyard was designed for the town residents to take refuge when under attack.

It’s a good thing the Spanish acted quickly to build a stronger structure. In 1702, Governor James Moore of Charleston led his English forces against St. Augustine and the Castillo. He captured the town and set his cannon up among the houses to bombard the fortress.

What happened? Strangely, instead of shattering, the coquina stone merely compressed and absorbed the shock of the hit. The cannon balls just bounced off or sunk in a few inches. The shell rock worked! I think the bastion, angled system contributed quite a bit too.

A cannon ball fired at more solid material, such as granite or brick, would shatter the wall into flying shards; but cannon balls fired at the walls of the Castillo burrowed their way into the rock and stuck there, much like a bb would if fired into Styrofoam. So the thick coquina walls absorbed, or deflected projectiles rather than yielding to them, providing a surprisingly long-lived fortress (or is it a castle)?

Even when General Oglethorpe attacked St. Augustine in 1740 and bombarded the Castillo for 27 days, the walls held firm. The rock made of seashells turned out to be an excellent building material. When the Spanish decided to fortify the southern approaches to St. Augustine by building Fort Matanzas later that year, they again used coquina stone, and, like the Castillo, this smaller fort was never captured.

What if the Spanish did not have this stone? If not for coquina, perhaps the British would have captured St. Augustine much earlier than 1763, when they finally gained Florida by treaty. If the British gained Florida earlier, it’s possible the course of the American Revolution would have changed. Maybe the U.S. would still be a part of Great Britain. The history of the U.S.A. could have been much different had it not been for little clams, and coquina.

Fort or Castle?

Again, is the Castillo a fort or castle? I guess there isn’t a clear answer. According to Wikipedia,  a castle is a private, fortified residence. Merriam-Webster dictionary says a castle is “a large fortified building or set of buildings; a retreat safe against intrusion or invasion.”  Oxford English Dictionary says it is “a large building, typically of the medieval period, fortified against attack with thick walls, battlements, towers, and in many cases a moat.”

The Castillo de San Marcos fits all of those definitions in one way, or at one time or another. When it was first built, the governor of St. Augustine resided inside the building, which would make it a “private fortified residence.” It is most definitely a large, fortified building that provided a retreat safe for the people of St. Augustine against invasion. At one time it housed about 1,500 people for 51 days while the English laid siege. It also has thick walls, battlements, towers and a moat. 

Most of the fortifications the Spanish built in the new world were named Castillos. Perhaps it is a hold-over from medieval times, meant to inspire their people and instill fear in their enemies? The Spanish were fond of decoration and embellishment in the physical designs of their fortresses; they may have felt the same about their names. As of yet, there has been no documentation found explaining exactly why they chose to use Castillo rather than Fuerte or Fortaleza. However, it is interesting to note that the wooden fort preceding the current stone one was also called Castillo de San Marcos. 

Also interesting is the fact that it does later become referred to as a fort. When the British gained Florida through the 1763 Treaty of Paris, they renamed the building Fort Saint Mark. The United States Army decided in 1825 to call it Fort Marion. Under those occupations, it was indeed used solely for military functions.

The British and the Americans did not plan to use it as a place of refuge for the citizens of St. Augustine. They both used the fort as barracks, for military storage, and a few times as a military prison. The National Park Service and United States Congress decided to restore its original name in 1942, in honor of its unique Spanish history, so it went back to Castillo de San Marcos for good.  I say it’s a fort.

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

Long and short shots of Castillo

Long barrel cannon aimed at historic downtown St. Augustine, just for show

Two of the reasons Castillo de San Marcos in St. Augustine continues to stand today is the weaponry to protect it and the ability to absorb incoming rounds. 

The U.S. National Park Service oversees and maintains the Castillo and provides some history highlights.  “The cannon appeared in Europe about the beginning of the 12th century. Early cannons or “gonnes” (hence the name gonne or gunne powder) tended to be gigantic, unwieldy monsters as dangerous to the user as to the intended enemy.  Yet, they were still frightening, helping to ensure their place on the field of war.

https://www.visitstaugustine.com/event/cannon-firing

Cannon composition improved over time, particularly during the Middle Ages, resulting in the “artillery” used in the 18th and 19th centuries.  Some were made of iron and some of bronze. 

As you can imagine, cast iron was preferred since it was lighter and less expensive; however, it also presented maintenance challenges, particularly around coastal, salty environments.  Bronze tended to hold up much longer but was more expensive.  Location helped determine the type of cannon to use too. 

While iron cannons deteriorated more quickly and were discarded, bronze cannons could be melted down and recast into a new weapon. You can imagine the beauty of the artwork in the bronze cannons when they were new and shiny.  One can still see some of the details in these old pieces of devastation AND art.   

Although I’m not an artillery expert, you can interpret the long cannons were designed for longer distance – like reaching out and saying hello to the ships sneaking in from the Atlantic Ocean.  The 18 and 24-inch balls can sure do some damage to these floating structures. 

Fishing boats work near the Atlantic Beach inlet near the old fort. Imagine days of old when invading ships tried to enter the area with long cannons firing on them

To me, the short cannons are like a shotgun. They can certainly wreak havoc on troop movements trying to approach the fort.  Some of these short cannons remind you of big, round pots that blast out multiple projectiles. (See those along the seawall in the image at the end of the post.)

Today, bronze guns at the Castillo are covered in a green patina due to the environmental elements.  While iron rusts, bronze or copper turns green. 

Bronze cannon with raised “dolphins” on top as handles; appropriate since dolphins are often seen surfacing in an arch movement in the Matanzas Bay located beside the fort,

The cannons have several key features in common. At the rear you can find the name of the maker, the city where it was made and the date when the gun was manufactured. Just above the back toward the muzzle is the royal coat of arms of the Spanish King & Queen who reigned during the making of the weapon. 

Moving closer to the front of the gun, a banner bears the cannon’s name. Two of the Castillo’s cannons also have a second, larger banner that reads “Violati Fulmina Regis” (thunderbolts of an offended/angry king). Each trunnion (the pivot bars on the sides of the gun) lists where the metal was acquired, the gun’s maintenance record, and how much the weapon weighs. Other features found on some of the cannons include capture dates stamped by the US Army.  https://www.nps.gov/casa/learn/historyculture/arms.htm

I find it interesting that the Castillo de San Marcos is a museum of cannons found in various places around the world and may not be the exact ones protecting the fort during the ages.  The National Park Service depicts where respective cannons are placed on, and in. the fort as well as some of their origin.  https://www.nps.gov/casa/learn/historyculture/artillery-tour.htm

Design layout and cannon placement of Castillo de San Marcos (NPS)

1. 24-pounder cast iron. Circa 1750. Transferred to the National Park Service (NPS) with the fort in 1935.
2. Same as above.
3. 4-pounder bronze. Seville, 1737. Named La Sibila (The Fortune Teller). Gifted to NPS, 1953.
4. 16-pounder bronze. Barcelona, 1743. Named El Camilo (The Camillus). Transferred from West Point Military Academy, 1962. Interesting note: Made from recycled bronze.
5. 24-pounder cast iron. Circa 1690. Transferred 1935.
6. 18-pounder cast iron. Circa 1750. Transferred 1935.
7. Same as #6.
8. 24-pounder cast iron. Circa 1750. Transferred 1935.
9. 18-pounder cast iron. Circa 1690. Made in Sweden. Found in Savannah River, 1914. Gifted to NPS, 1955.
10. 15-inch bronze mortar. Barcelona, 1724. Loaned to NPS, 1971.
11. 12-inch bronze mortar. Seville, 1784. Gifted to NPS, 1958.
12. 8-pounder bronze. Seville, 1798. Named El Uenado (The Deer). Gifted to NPS, 1978. Interesting note: U’s and V’s were sometimes interchanged historically.
13. 6-pounder bronze. Seville, 1762. Transferred from West Point Military Academy, 1962.
14. 18-pounder bronze. Seville, 1735. Named El Daedalo (The Daedalus). Loaned to NPS, 1971.
15. 12-pounder bronze. Seville, 1798. Named Facheno (Braggart). Received from West Point Military Academy, 1962.
16. 4-pounder bronze. Seville, 1795. Named Abilud (older brother, or Biblical name). Gifted to NPS, 1960.
17. 2-pounder cast iron. Circa 1700. Transferred 1935.
18. Same as above
19. 12-inch bronze mortar. Barcelona, 1783. Named El Icaro (The Icarus). Gifted to NPS, 1960.
20. 12-inch bronze mortar. Seville, 1807. Named Abajado (Crouching One). Gifted to NPS, 1960.
21. 4-pounder cast iron. Circa 1700. Found buried in St. Augustine. Gifted to NPS, 1954.
22. 15-inch bronze mortar. Barcelona, 1724. Loaned to NPS, 1971. Interesting note: Has a rare Luis I crest.
23. 12-inch bronze mortar. Seville, 1774. Gifted to NPS, 1958.
24. 4-pounder bronze. Barcelona, 1768. Named El Jazmin (The Jasmine). Transferred to NPS, 1962.
25. 3-pounder cast iron. Circa 1690. Found buried in St. Augustine. Gifted to NPS, 1954.

Located in Courtyard and Inside Rooms
26. 18-pounder bronze. Seville, 1764. Named El Milanes (The one from Milan). Loaned to NPS, 1971.
27. Fragment of 16-pounder cast iron cannon. Circa 1690. Exploded in 1702, killing 3 crew members. Found buried in Castillo’s moat.

Located in Water Battery (Seawall)
28. – 35. Cast iron howitzers of various sizes. A design combining a cannon and a mortar. Circa 1815-1846. Transferred 1935. 
36. 32-pounder cast iron. United States Model 1841 Seacoast Cannon. Found in the waters off Naval Station Mayport, Jacksonville, FL. Transferred to NPS, 1978.

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

Metal scraps, life value

Metal recycling collection point

Thoughts of every day being Earth Day,

As we think of the things we buy and discard.

They have lost their value we say,

Casting them aside, rust and all.

Crane lifts scrap metal at a collection point

Jobs created by things left over.

Forms remade, from what we once knew,

Heated mold accepts all, regardless of strength, shape and color,

Out comes something of value, now brand new.

We think our lives get old – and we rust,

Not wanting to be useful again,

Allowing life to take its own toll.

But the Creator, Master, who designed us all,

Says come to Him, young and old. 

He makes anew, from what we discard,

Life is much worth, even more than we’re told. 

💖

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
  (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
    google_ad_client: "ca-pub-1054958321883841",
    enable_page_level_ads: true
  });
</script>

Variety is beautiful

I see colors of red, blue, yellow, white, black, green, orange and beyond,

Colors of size – big and small,

Colors of life, part of us all.

Which will rise, when given a chance,

Release from its anchor and watch them dance.

Is one color more than the other?

One size able to do more than the color?

Life full of variety and thought,

Each of us, regardless of color or size,

Equally important, no matter where we are,

We will love others more when this we realize.

Blessings along the Way!

Ron

No beauty and rejected

We the world reflect various beliefs,

Who am I to question what you believe, or do not?

Each has mind, soul and thought within;

Given by divine or simply of women and men.

Lives reflect what surrounds us, products of what was taught, and shown;

My views formed at early age; I searched for truth, released from the cage.

If we seek, we will find, less we desire other paths sublime.

I choose not to judge others’ beliefs; I only speak for myself – and my life’s relief. 

It’s a relationship I learned to love; the Love I found from God above. 

He the sacrifice to atone for me; and answered to my feeble plea. 

He bought me with a very high price; it cost the one who came, His precious life. 

Isaiah relates suffering and pain, of the coming Messiah – the world would not know.

He comes for all, God reflects His Love; life blood poured out – from His veins it flowed.

But who would believe, message from above; He grew like a tender shoot, with no beauty to attract,

Even today, many turn away, allow nothing within; waiting – waiting – for answers to be exact.

Despised, rejected by each of us around; has it really changed from way back when,

No matter how gloom and dark, light overcomes and provides life.

We didn’t believe – one to earth He would send?

Yet He bore our pain, suffering; pierced for the world to see,

But who is to blame, putting Him on the tree?

Was it government, religion, others – but no – it was even me.

Skull Hill face in Jerusalem. Do you think this is the actual site of where Jesus’ cross was placed – on top of this hill with the face resembling that of a skull? 

Where is one today who would die for another?

Would it be sister for sister, or brother for brother?

I’m not able to display such Love, as only God could show.

He gave His life for me; now risen, living – and I am free.

(Inspired by Isaiah 53)

For an image to see what the crucifixion site of Jesus at Golgotha (Jerusalem) may have looked like, you can link it here on Trip Advisor.  https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g293983-d325092-Reviews-Golgotha-Jerusalem_Jerusalem_District.html

Blessings along the Way!

Ron